Uncategorized


win7

Status Update: Windows 7 upgrade has been particularly painless.

The restore of the old Vista install to a new disk was 1.5 hours of waiting. The actual upgrade to windows 7 was around 40 minutes total I spose. A few updates to download and voila.

I didn’t know whether I had to format the new drive before restoring the Vista insall so I did. That took several hours :(   The Windows Home Server recovery disk is naturally pretty bare so it wasn’t clear to me if I had to format or not. It all worked like a treat in the end.

First thing to do was get VirtualBox up and running so I could do some work. No problem, just added back the virtual disk on the E: drive and the virtual machine came up no problem.

Windows Home Server is giving a bit of grief still though. I can’t connect or map drives. I have my WHS set as Guest access open for everyone on the network. For some reason the new Win7 machine keeps asking for passwords and there isn’t one.

Doesn’t seem to be related to the new “homegroup” feature as that is win7-win7 only. Will have to solve this one later.

oooh my desktop background just changed. sweet. another aussie image, rainforest I guess.

Will do the biggies like Office, LightRoom later.

Decided that I ought to upgrade my main desktop machine to Windows 7. I have been running happily on Vista for 2.5 years. The machine is a Athlon X2 with 4Gb of RAM and a vanilla video card. The main reason for upgrading is to start with a new install. The Vista install is running smoothly, but after a couple of years of installing and uninstalling software you do accumulate guff in the registry and in program files etc.

I have an upgrade copy of Win7 to get me from Vista Home Premium to Windows 7 Home Premium.

At the same time I plan to run the new windows on a new 1TB drive.

Currently Vista runs on a 160Gb drive with another 250Gb drive as the E: drive.

So this presents problem first up. An upgrade should ideally use the same disk or partition. Luckily I have a Windows Home Server to help me.

The plan is to restore the backup of Vista from the C: drive to a newly formatted larger C: drive. After activating the new 1TB Vista install (which is trivial), I’ll run the upgrade (forcing a fresh install) of Windows 7.

Hopefully then the old E: drive can hang of Win7 and I can re-install apps and move my documents back to the main drive.

That’s the plan anyway. I’ll let you know if my plans are pure folly.

So far the 100Gb of data is restoring back over the network. Around 1.5 hours it reckons.

Decided on the spur of the moment to take advantage of overcast skies and headed up to King’s Park to check out the wildflower season. Elliot came with me so I had to keep the session to about an hour.

There is plenty more to photograph up there, so I hope I can get to return at some stage.

Click on the thumbnail for a larger view.

All shots were with the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 lens. I imagine that a macro lens and more time would produce better results, but was happy with these as snaps of what I saw.

This little fellow got trapped in our bedroom. One butterfly net and some flapping later and he was free again.

  

This little fellow got hit by a car outside our place. Took him to the vet. Wing looked bad.

This little fellow got hit by a car outside our place. Took him to the vet. Wing looked bad.

Am seeing a new class of spammers on the Rosacea Support Community forum. They are obviously real human spammers, not the `robots auto registering’ sort that we have seen of late.

This new breed know how to use the rich text of the composer to hide web links in forum posts. Normal visitors won’t see the links – perhaps only be confused by the strange text from someone who isn’t really there for the usual reasons.

Web search engines will see the link though and give the destination site some `link juice’ from the forum site. This seems like a good ploy as some sites have been around for a long time and have become authority sites in the eyes of the likes of google.

Can I give a big free hint to you @#$@#$!^% spammers; google is clever enough to know what a hidden link looks like and will ignore it.

The annoying downside for site owners is that a forum needs to be baby sat. More and more onerous requirements on new members for eg. stopping them posting new links for the first 20 posts, just makes it more annoying for genuine members to freely use the site.

Whack-a-mole round #42 continues … as long as there are economies with cheap labour and industries who want to advertise the spammers will be with us.

8-06-2009 11-11-41 AM

seemingly innocent post

8-06-2009 10-56-27 AM

perhaps a bit clearer view of what they are doing

8-06-2009 10-57-53 AM

what they actually typed.

20090414_5475

12-03-2009 9-54-52 AM So I’m really happy with siteground.com as a host – they are cheap and their support is fast and accurate, even brilliant.

But I do have to wonder what sort of false economy or empty marketing is used to promote a shared hosting service with 768000 MB of storage and 750 000 MB of bandwidth a month.

I had a process go haywire and they were close to shutting me off for using too many shared resources. So I know they monitor how much of the box your little account uses.

Leaves me wondering how anyone could possible use that much bandwidth without trigger a trap – or indeed how you would ever backup that much data.

Next Page »